STARYAN

SOLUTION / 05

Custom SecurityEngineering

Security for systems that do not fit a standard checklist.

The problem the organisation faces

Some systems were never meant to fit a checklist — agent platforms, cyber-physical products, non-standard protocols, research prototypes. For these, the useful answer is engineering and research, not a longer report.

Who this is for

  • 01Systems that span software and the physical world
  • 02Products with non-standard protocols
  • 03Teams building AI-driven or autonomous systems
  • 04Problems a checklist cannot cover

What the solution covers

  • Security architecture

    Design-level review for systems that span software, AI and the physical world.

  • Agent & autonomous systems

    Permission models, tool boundaries and failure containment for agentic stacks.

  • Connected devices · IoT · robotics

    Protocols, control paths and runtime behaviour, with operational constraints respected.

  • Special protocols

    Proprietary and industrial protocols, reversed and assessed safely.

  • Security research & engineering

    Focused research and build work where the answer does not exist yet.

How the work runs

Not a fixed-scope test — an engineering engagement with evidence at every step.

  1. DEFINE
  2. ARCHITECT
  3. VALIDATE
  4. ENGINEER
  5. EVIDENCE

What the organisation receives

  • Executive view

    Findings and risk in management language, mapped to the obligations they answer.

  • Technical findings

    Reproduction steps, affected assets and root cause for every finding.

  • Evidence

    Proof you can reproduce — payloads, logs and screenshots attached to the rating.

  • Priorities

    A 30/60/90-day plan with owners, so work starts the week the report lands.

  • Retest status

    Where retesting is in scope: Closed, Risk Accepted with an expiry, or Monitoring with a follow-up date.

Typical triggers

A new product with unusual architectureA robotics or IoT deploymentA research collaborationPre-investment technical diligence

Related programme

Runs as a Custom programme by definition — scoped around the system itself.

Technical findings and recommendations reflect engineering judgement — they are not legal advice.

Discuss this requirement.

Tell us the system, the timeline and the worry — the answer will be a scope, not a sales deck.

Discuss this requirement ↗