STARYAN

SOLUTION / 01

Exposure &External Risk

Know what the outside world can reach — before deciding what needs deeper testing.

The problem the organisation faces

Internet-facing assets change continuously. Domains, cloud endpoints, certificates and mail records accumulate faster than most teams can track — and an attacker only needs the one nobody remembered.

Who this is for

  • 01SMEs building their first security programme
  • 02Organisations whose internet-facing assets grow quickly
  • 03Online businesses with annual review cycles
  • 04Teams that have never mapped their external footprint

What the solution covers

  • External attack surface discovery

    Every internet-facing asset an attacker could see: domains, subdomains, IPs, cloud endpoints, forgotten legacy.

  • Vulnerability assessment

    Known weaknesses and weak configuration, validated by engineers instead of a raw scanner dump.

  • TLS, domain & email security

    Certificate hygiene, DNS, SPF / DKIM / DMARC — the controls that stop impersonation and takeover.

  • Cloud exposure review

    AWS, Azure and M365 identity, storage and network, checked from the outside in.

How the work runs

A continuous outside-in view, not a one-off scan.

  1. DISCOVER
  2. VALIDATE
  3. RATE
  4. TRACK

What the organisation receives

  • Executive view

    Findings and risk in management language, mapped to the obligations they answer.

  • Technical findings

    Reproduction steps, affected assets and root cause for every finding.

  • Evidence

    Proof you can reproduce — payloads, logs and screenshots attached to the rating.

  • Priorities

    A 30/60/90-day plan with owners, so work starts the week the report lands.

  • Retest status

    Where retesting is in scope: Closed, Risk Accepted with an expiry, or Monitoring with a follow-up date.

Typical triggers

IPO or audit timelineA new internet-facing serviceAnnual security baselineM&A due diligence

Related programme

Typically starts with Essential and extends to Enhanced as the business and its exposure grow.

Technical findings and recommendations reflect engineering judgement — they are not legal advice.

Discuss this requirement.

Tell us the system, the timeline and the worry — the answer will be a scope, not a sales deck.

Discuss this requirement ↗